Comments on: Keep This Phony ‘Senator’ Away From Our Children

By: Dr. Quincy, M.E.

Dr. Quincy, M.E. — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:14:39 +0000

I remember he had VB before but why does Combover Carr need his “producer” to talk so much on air as a sidekick (i.e., “Sandy?”) Is she there to ensure he doesn’t exceed his daily limit of “moonbat” mentions? All he did today was (no surprise) re-hash what Limbaugh did earlier regarding the fake jobs created/saved claims under the Obama Admin.

By: Larry

Larry — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:46:35 +0000

I had a good laugh a few weeks ago when the Herald said they were thinking about charging for the on-line version. Who would be stupid enough to actually pay money (even with the falling value of the dollar) to read Margie’s and Howie’s tired, old columns?…Brian how about a post on which show is now worse…Jim/Margie or Howie/Sandy.

By: piratetoby

piratetoby — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:27:06 +0000

Cricket: You never disapoint. As I posted you never can answer a simple question (i.e preaching to the choir), instead you come back with a verbal attack on me, deflecting, yet again, the chance to show you have a brain.

And my serial blogger theory was backed up by you, my dear, by admitting to posting here with various screen names.

You’re a friggin’ fruit loop living in cyber space. Get a life.

By: Cricket

Cricket — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:19:30 +0000

oh yes, a serial blogger. You really are such a dope Pirate.

By: piratetoby

piratetoby — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:50:59 +0000

No feud, Pizza. I’m just sick to death of people who flap their jaws for no apparent reason. Who blog on sites with nothing new to add, nothing thought provoking, nothing humourous. And God forbid if you ask them the basis for any of their inate statements, they protest how they’re being attacked, and they don’t have to, or feel like, responding.

And to further deflect their lack of real knowledge on any given issue, they respond with name calling….jerk, fool, etc.

But she keeps coming back. Don’t ask me why. The only possible reason is that she’s a serial blogger. No life, just blogging away.

blah, blah, blah…….

By: New York Pizza

New York Pizza — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:41:42 +0000

Cricket and piratetoby: Is your feud real? If so, your feud is more entertaining than The John and Jeff Show. You both could be the new Clapprood and Whitley (or Mayor Menino and Andy Mose.)

By: piratetoby

piratetoby — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:01:56 +0000

Cricket: “It’s a Montessori School …….Kirk is preaching to the choir.”

Stating Dr. Montessori’s mission statement does not answer/explain your comment.

“Preaching to the choir” implies his audience (the students) already believed in what he was trying to convey to them.

Your answer, stating Dr. Montessori’s mission statement, explains nothing more than the reason behind speakers like Kirk being chosen.

Is that articulate enough for you?

No, you don’t have to debate me. However I don’t have to cease from noting how you interject yourself into every topic with nothing of intellegence, importance or funny to say.

Serial poster….how many sites do you post on?

Can’t you find another remedial site where you’d fit in better?

By: Cricket

Cricket — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:20:15 +0000

Pirate, what bandwagon, it’s you who can’t articulate. Give specifics. I explained the Montessori school comment and concept. You are the loudmouth bullshitter here.
Who said I had to debate? Your rules again.
Why don’t you inject yourself in to yet another topic here. Fool.

By: piratetoby

piratetoby — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:56:04 +0000

Schieffer: You’re right. This “concern” for our children is just a thinly veiled attempt to bash the manner in which Kirk was appointed as interim Senator. And that issue is long dead and buried.

The only way Brian can dig it up is to report on Kirk’s recent visit to a school. Let it go, Brian.

And Cricket, I am pretty much the same in real life as I am here. I have a low tolerance for bull-shit, and uninformed loud mouths. People who jump on the bandwagon, and are unable to articulate little about said bandwagon and when called or questioned on it, their response is typically ad hominem.

If you were able to engage in an intelligent debate, you wouldn’t feel attacked. And, if you think I’m a jerk, that’s fine. I’m not too concerned with your opinion of me.

By: Bob Schieffer

Bob Schieffer — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:27:43 +0000

As for Gatehouse newspapers, I saw a glimmer of hope when they hired interesting columnists, but then they got rid of them. Their editorials and endorsements are definitely pro-establishment, except and until the establishment politician spits in their face (by denying them access), then the see a glimmer of light. Oh, and they take press releases and reprint them uncritically, and their articles have little sense of history.