Expose The Hypocrisy


May 15, 2008
NYT Interviews Spygate Videographer


All of this Herald-bashing looks pretty silly after reading today's New York Times interview with former Pats videographer Matt Walsh.

Here's an excerpt:


Q. Did they tell you what their goals were with what you were filming?

A. Nope. They just told me to film the signals, pass the tape along to Ernie Adams. It was ... once I had done it for the first game, and I kind of understood a little bit of the process of how it was going, I actually asked one of our quarterbacks if the information that I provided was beneficial in any way. He said, ‘Actually, probably about 75 percent of the time, Tampa Bay ran the defense we thought they were going to run. If not more.’ Because a lot of times, when you’re coming out of a timeout, the defense isn’t signaled in. It’s just told in the huddle. ‘So that’s even discounting those as times we didn’t know.’

Q. What was the first game you filmed?

A. Tampa Bay, preseason, 2000.

Q. Those signals were then used in the opener?

A. Right. We only lost like 21-16.

Q. Did you have the sense that it was beneficial?

A. It was very limited, the people that were involved in this. And it was presented to me that it should be kept quiet, and there really didn’t seem ... even the people that were involved in it, along with me, didn’t seem like they wanted to talk very much about it.

Q. Was that an initial conversation during your training?

A. Nope, it was just shortly before that preseason game against Tampa Bay. Where Jimmy Dee first came to me said, ‘This next game, I want you shooting all the Tampa Bay signals coming in.’ And at that time, he even seemed unsure himself of what specifically it was that the coach’s wanted me to film.

Posted by Brian Maloney at 11:49 AM | Comments (4)  | Track


Comments

Why does it make the Herald-bashing look silly? That article in the NYT had Walsh saying nothing about video-taping the Rams' walk-through prior to the Super Bowl. In fact, Walsh (and now, everyone else) said no taping happened then. But John Tomase of the Herald said exactly the opposite: a whole-cloth story without a shred of substantiation. So, the 'Herald-bashing' is not only justified, it should continue. Massarotti is picking up where Tomase left off, blaming everyone and everyone in a 'pay-no-attention-to-the-man-behind-the-curtain' sort of way. Of course the beatings will continue, and they should. Boston's sports media cabal is an utter laughingstock now with perhaps only one notable exception: Bob Ryan.

The 'Deflectors of Attention' over at the Herald are suggesting that 'we' (read: everyone else but them) are fawning over the Patriots and giving them a pass. Not true! We know that the Patriots broke the rules and we have accepted that part of the story. But what we will NOT accept is a misdirection campaign by the Herald that points the finger in a whole different direction. The issue here is the 2002 Super Bowl taping story, which is what the Herald is being called on the carpet for. NOT the other 'spying' episodes, which we have accepted.

Massarotti is using his 'cleverness' to misdirect the issue here. Stick to what happened at the 2002 Super Bowl, Mazz, and you might not end up in the Land of Misfit Boston Sports Hacks like Tomase most certainly will.

Posted by: Chris at May 15, 2008 02:48 PM


No, the Herald still screwed up royally and the bashing is somewhat justified (though the tar and feathering of Tomase might be a little extreme - sorry for the awful visual).

At this point, I would assert that the Patriots' "misinterpretation of the rules" excuse has been repudiated (though Walsh may not be credible, if it can be established that he lied to Tomase about the walkthrough).

Still, we are talking about the same thing (taping signals) that they have already been punished for. Was it beneficial? Probably, but we will never know how important it was, especially since they managed to go 18-1 without the tapes last year.

Posted by: Fair and Balanced at May 15, 2008 03:03 PM


Kraft and his band of thieves (Belichick, Johnathon, Pioli, et al) are all dead to me after they cheated like they did. They all should be caned. Felony caning. And Jay Severin should be the punisher. Jay rules. Jay rocks my world.

Posted by: Celtic Frost at May 15, 2008 03:24 PM


Did the NYT really print: And at that time, he even seemed unsure himself of what specifically it was that the coach’s wanted me to film.?
Isn't it "coaches"?
If that is the case, another example of media conglomerates (print and broadcast) letting the details slide, which leads to not caring about the big picture, which leads to crap.

Posted by: ed asst at May 16, 2008 04:24 PM