Expose The Hypocrisy


August 03, 2008
Reigh Is The Real Victim


Once again, as major
news events unfold, some decent live-and-local weekend talk radio would have served us well.

With Clark Rockefeller captured, Reigh is now free to go back overseas to be ignored by her mother.

I'm not defending him by any means, but I've yet to shed a single tear for her "mother", who to date has had only a tiny role in raising Reigh. She's every bit as kooky as her mysterious ex-husband and her own background deserves far more scrutiny than she's been given by the fawning media.

Why hasn't anyone looked into how she came to be associated with the financially mismanaged home of author Edith Wharton?

Or her ties to discredited, bank-busting New York Senator Chucky Schumer?

Rockefeller Reigh.jpg

As for Clark, until the highly ill-advised "kidnapping" of his daughter, the worst anybody could say about the man was that they weren't sure who he was. If it was really such a big issue, then why were they married for so many years?

Now, Reigh will no longer know the one parent who has been there for her from the beginning.

Yes, Clark may have brought this upon himself, but I don't think this woman ever saw Reigh as anything more than a weapon to use against her husband during a nasty divorce proceeding.

Posted by Brian Maloney at 10:56 AM | Comments (12)  | Track


Comments

I tried reading between the lines of this news coverage which, of course, was 100% against Rockefeller, and I figured it out when I came across the information that the ex-wife had relocated to London, basically making it impossible for Rockefeller to see his kid except for a couple of times a year. Despite what Rockefeller is up to in his own life, I think the story boiled down to something as basic as a father being separated from his daughter.

Posted by: Dan Zee at August 3, 2008 06:48 PM


"Reigh Is The Real Victim"

"I don't think this woman ever saw Reigh as anything more than a weapon to use against her husband during a nasty divorce proceeding."

Based on what evidence go you assume Mrs Boss is not a good parent Reigh? If you have any beside your instincts then supply it. Otherwise, you should probably not assume you know anything about it.

I bet you made your conclusion based on the fact Mrs. Boss is a professional women. Think about.

Posted by: Neil at August 3, 2008 07:57 PM


Neil;

Do you have children? Have you ever been divorced? Have you ever felt the sting of false accusations in court as your soon to be ex-wife uses every means necessary to ruin your life; including and especially your child?

If not, I suggest you keep your comments to yourself.

Be careful not to hurt yourself when you fall off that high (rented) horse.

Posted by: V at August 4, 2008 06:20 AM


I can tell you this from first-hand experience: my husband's "breeder" ex thinks she has control over "their" kids just because she birthed them! It's as if, because she has a womb, she owns them. And most judges in MA agree!

So, while what this blue-blood-wannabe did was reprehensible to the max and he should be punished to the fullest extent of the law, I also think that many men are basically made into eunuchs by the scheming, manipulative, Harpy women they were formerly married to (hello, Javi?).

Posted by: Celtic Frost at August 4, 2008 07:39 AM


Brian, your comments are unconscionable. Why should talk radio - or any media outlet, for that matter - rip apart this woman's reputation? Because she REPORTEDLY didn't spend enough time with her daughter?! Someone in the family had to work, because the layabout husband sure didn't!!

I'm with Neil. Unless you go out and prove it, you have no right to imply this woman was involved in any financial wrongdoing. And if you have a problem with the custody arrangement, blame the judge, not the mother.

I'm sensing in your comments a hostility toward women or divorced mothers - why?

Posted by: Lee at August 4, 2008 10:22 AM


Chucky Schummer???????? WTF

Posted by: Celtic foam at August 4, 2008 05:20 PM



Moron Baloney strikes again...stick to what you know -BEING AWFUL AT RADIO.

Posted by: Freltic Cost at August 4, 2008 06:55 PM



This site is why the internet is a failed experiment.

Posted by: Freltic Cost at August 4, 2008 06:59 PM


Celtic Crapper...I have over and over again exposed your lies and your sad and pathetic way of LYING and TELLING TOO MUCH FAKE information to the posters on this blog. The key is to EXPOSE you which I have successfully done as well as remind others of your MANY fake names (like that nasty little Tony Snow post you did under LAWRENCE...funny how that poop stain has NEVER appeared again, isn't it?).

What a psycho you are...on SSI and haunting and trolling places like this and you have a propensity for ACCUSING others of the very anti-social crimes YOU commit (like me not exposing you when I HAVE and accusing others of homophobia when you are the biggest homophobe going! Ain't nothing lover about you LOSER!)

For a "fake" Liberal do you ever notice you do most of the bashing here? Calling others names FIRST and when making up your fake life you are constantly putting down the fake players (breeders?). If ONLY you really had the life you fake...you'd get your corpulent SSI taking smelly tuchis OFF THE NET, LOSAHHHHH. LOL!

Posted by: JSYK at August 4, 2008 08:10 PM


I should change my handle to Puppet Master or maybe to Fiddler... I play the tune, and JSYK dances to it. So predictable, and way, way too easy. Bwa-ha-ha.

Posted by: Celtic Frost at August 5, 2008 10:52 AM


OMG!!! This place is like a P Town bitch
session/confessional...and from here let us
dash down to Fire Island.

Posted by: Celtic foam at August 5, 2008 11:53 AM


Word of advice Celtic: straight people are less likely to use the "F" word if you refrain from calling them "breeders". Just sayin'...

Posted by: Amanda Rekonwith at August 9, 2008 10:54 AM