J. Keller another dumb^^s!

what's shakin thread?!
Still got the 8 hour delay time that is the death nell to the blog thing?

Damn! you gotta get it shakin here.
the delay is excruciating!
Complete Bollocks!!!

I be given it to ya but the delay is well lets say not enough to keep me off the streets.

Lets go. winters coming! Improve the IT bridge here. Hop to it grasshopper!

Oh yea, what a khant!

Dear God in Heaven,
Please, please, please make Barack Obama pick John Kerry as his running mate. I promise to go to church every Sunday, stop cussing, stop chasing women of low morals, quit gambling, drink nothing stronger than Communion wine and quietly put up with the trolls that have infested this site.
Amen

As the saying goes: "John Kerry is the gift that keeps on giving"

Please Jesus make this happen.

Kerry and Obama,,,,,flip and flop,,,,what a duo,,,it just keeps getting better,,,,two losers on the same ticket,,,,doesn't get any better! God definetly has a sense of humor!

Hello, this is Jesus.
Who is John Kerry??

Dear Jesus, Please see to it that you
consecrate that Communion wine that NH
is anxious to have a slug of. Thank you

Barbara, flip and flop - I love it.

Although I admit I voted for Kerry in '04 instead of Little Napoleon Bush Jr. Warts and all, I felt better trusting the nation's fate to Kerry over Bush.

-CF

Oh...and Babs,stop pretending to be "Joy". There's too many trolls here and your act is tiresome

"Would that it were; would that it were." It will be quite amusing to see Barry picking his running mate while at least half in the Convention will be cheering for Hilly to be 'The Chosen One' (Trademark applied for). As for Kerry-OhBomba: I'll echo everyone else: Please make it so. WOULD THAT IT WERE!

There are just so many different ways to go with this, I can't choose one.

Can you imagine, the prospective first bitch and mama T together?

This could very well be the exact perscription for talk radio not only in the New England area but nationwide.

The planet has a fever! And so does JSYK / faux-Celtic Frost. Sadly, the poseur is well off the mark, so much so that it's not remotely funny. Sadly, what else do you expect from a Revere yute? Tee-hee-hee.

Everyone knows how much respect I have for Barbara. She is a goddess, send to earth to amuse and beguile us. She is the soul of this blog.

-CF

Hey CF nice try, but we all know who the imposter is....

I almost want to see it happen just so your heads explode when they get elected. Bush barely beat Kerry in 2004 and his policies have only looked worse since then. I'm not rooting against Bush. I wish we weren't still taking casualties. I wish we were greeted as liberators. I wish it was a clean operation and the Mission was actually Accomplished when he landed on the carrier and hung the banner. I even bought into the original rationale for the War on Terror. I am more sanguine about it than most, but there are a lot of Americans (not just "moonbats") who do not feel that the war was well prosecuted and are no longer buying the neo-con talking points. Like it or not (and I don't necessarily think it is a good thing) many Americans vote on "feelings" more than "issues". Once again, this isn't a "moonbat" phenomenon - remember the whole "who would you rather have a beer with" argument? Ludicrous!

The tide is turning toward the Dems. Republicans are trying to sling stuff against Congress, but it is not sticking yet, as evidenced by the democratic majority that continues to increase. McCain has a shot, but at this point it feels like Obama's time if he avoids a major misstep. He's too smart to pick Kerry though. If his choice was purely based on governing ability, Joe Biden, who's been closer to right on Iraq (right as in correct, not as in wing) than almost everyone, would be a great choice. If the numbers force him to be more political, I'd see him picking someone like Kane that might be able to help him win a key state or region.

Regardless, denigrate all you like, but on Nov. 5th there's a damn good chance he'll be the President-elect, so as good Americans in a time of war you should get ready to rally around our leadership. Maybe it makes you feel better to think that everyone who doesn't share your political point of view is deserving of some derisive name (moonbat, limosine liberal, elitist, whatever...), but you are delusional if you don't think that there is a large and formidible group of voters who feel very differently than you do, and unless I miss my guess, their time is coming.

Much as I like Biden's philosophies as much as anyone, he is not electable since he has been a serial plagiarist since law school (when he took an F for plagiarizing a paper) thru the 1988 Dukakis nomination run and since then... I like Joe fine, but those are mighty big things to overcome. JSYK - how do you feel on this one? I'd much rather see Mr. Therese.

Mr. Prag-man,

The one hole in your theory is this:

There is this thing called youtube.com. Every wonderful answer given by the messiah will certainly be posted. Even the answer where messiah stopped himself from saying Thomas did not have enough EXPERIENCE to be a Supreme Court Justice. He did not answer questions as mc-lame did. (I can't not vote for mc-lame.) EXPERIENCE is a word YOU WILL NOT HEAR FROM messiah.

Without a teleprompter he can not speak. Yes, I will admit he READS well but if asked a question requiring an answer his EXPERIENCE shows.

Barbara your vapidity is stunning. Me and the hubby laugh at your posts,the ramblings of a senile old battle ax!

-CF

Mr. Pragmatic,

You claim that Joe Biden (aka The Smartest Man in the Room - Just Ask Him) would be the choice for VP if the choice was based on "governing ability" and that Biden has "been closer to right on Iraq... than almost everyone".

Is that the same Senator Joe Biden who said that the surge would NEVER work and that the ONLY way to end US involvement in Iraq would be to partition Iraq into 3 autonomous zones - Kurds in the north and Sunnis and Shiites splitting the southern region with shared oil revenues between the 3 as the only factor that would keep these people from a genocidal civil war? It seems that "The Smartest Man in the Room - Just Ask Him" is dead friggin' wrong on that.

I know you can't admit it, but doesn't it feel awkward having to explain away an American military victory because your party has chosen the wrong side? A definitive victory in Iraq that gives birth to a moderate Muslim democracy that owes its existence to the United States is the worst possible thing that can happen to the Democrat party. Even if Obama wins in November, everyone on this planet can look at Iraq and know that he and his party opposed the very actions that pried a brutal dictator off of those people and set them on the path to freedom and self-determination.

And what about the left-wing MoveOn.org and Daily Kos demand that we end the war right now? Remember the "Honor Our Troops - Bring Them Home Now!" bumper stickers? I guess they are hard to find when Obama has backtracked on his previous total withdrawal stance with a new "nuanced" position calling for a ready reaction force to remain in the region in case of emergency. In case you don't know what that means, I'll explain: "We are going to pull out the troops George Bush stuck in a quagmire in Iraq because it was a bad idea to go there in the first place. We'll hang around the neighborhood, waiting for the situation to get really bad and then we'll put those troops right back in to Iraq to fight in the middle of a civil war that could have been avoided if we had the balls to stick it out until victory was achieved". Yeah, that will make the moonbats happy because, then, it will be THEIR war.

Just because a bunch of guilty liberals believe that they can cleanse themselves of the sins of slavery and racism by voting for Obama doesn't mean that he has any business being President of the United States. He has a grand total of 143 days experience in the US Senate before he started running for President - hell, we demand that our kids in the public schools go for 180 days each year. This guy is the least qualified person to ever be NOMINATED let alone ELECTED. Are you telling me this is the best candidate you can find in the ENTIRE Democrat party? Please excuse me while I go mix up some more Kool-Aid - you guys seem to have drunk it all.

NHradiofan, if I were unattached and if you were a progressive, I'd be courting you big-time. Smarts, writing ability, humor; you are the best poster this side of Barbara and that other dude who knows all about the ratings, etc. JSYK, don't you think that NHradiofan is awesome?

Hey NH, If the bar is out of kool-aid try
some of the communion wine. Your choice
of course.

Thanks to all the contributors for a spirited and well thought out argument.

"Is that the same Senator Joe Biden who said that the surge would NEVER work and that the ONLY way to end US involvement in Iraq would be to partition Iraq into 3 autonomous zones - Kurds in the north and Sunnis and Shiites splitting the southern region with shared oil revenues between the 3 as the only factor that would keep these people from a genocidal civil war?"
-I guess it comes down to what you believe. I don't think he is dead wrong and I am not ready to refer to the surge as a success. Of course more troops fare better than less, but is the overall plan working? I'm not so sure, and it certainly does not resemble anything tht was anticipated in 2003 in terms of cost and casualties.

"I know you can't admit it, but doesn't it feel awkward having to explain away an American military victory because your party has chosen the wrong side? A definitive victory in Iraq that gives birth to a moderate Muslim democracy that owes its existence to the United States is the worst possible thing that can happen to the Democrat party."
-I truly hope that you are right and I am wrong, but after reading the above, I am drawn back to Chris' quote from earlier in the thread, "Would that it were."

Good day all!